Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: "Thickness" of Finite Elements Modeling Floor/Roof Diaphragm
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)power.net
- Subject: Re: "Thickness" of Finite Elements Modeling Floor/Roof Diaphragm
- From: billp(--nospam--at)neosoft.com (Bill Polhemus)
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1995 06:11:07 -0500
- Sender: wai(--nospam--at)leland.Stanford.EDU
- Sender: wai(--nospam--at)leland.Stanford.EDU
On Thu, 7 Sep 1995 19:47:23 -0700, lhoward(--nospam--at)silcom.com (Lynn Howard) wrote: > >How would YOU set the THICKNESS parameter in order to model the shear > >stiffness as precisely as possible? Not sure, but I believe there is > >an equation for this set for in (I Believe) the SDI Manual (a copy of > >which I do NOT possess!) > > > >Any assistance would be MOST appreciated. > > > > You did not mention what type of floor or roof you are trying to model. > Since you mentioned the SDI Manual, I assume you are trying to model a metal > deck. If you are modeling a floor, and you have several inches of hardrock > concrete over the metal deck, I would model the floor as a concrete element, > using the average thickness of the concrete. You are correct; I do mean a metal deck. And what if you're using, say 3.5" to 4" of lightweight concrete for your floor deck? Would you still disregard the contribution of the deck? > If you are modeling a roof which does not have a hardrock concrete fill over > it, then it can become more complicated. It is important to know if you are > going fasten the side laps and end connections (by welding, button punching, > or screws). This can effect the overall stifness. > I have an older SDI manual, but on pages 21 to 31 it discusses > the question > of diaphragm stiffness, and proivdes example problems. I guess I just need to get a copy of the manual! > If you have a very stiff metal deck (thick guage, that is supported at close > intervals by joists, screwed or welded side laps and a lot of puddle welds > at the ends), you have have to calculate the overall stiffness, and then > approximate an equivalent flat plate. You can then adjust the E and G in > the vertical direction to compensate for the fact that it is modeled as a > thin plate element. Seems to me this is the situation I would have. Thank you. > > Hopes this helps [and I hope everyone won't tell me I'm wrong about this :)] Well, so far no argument from ME! *-------------------------------------------* * William L. Polhemus, Jr., P.E. * * * * "I'm not an intellectual...but I play one * * on the Internet..." * *-------------------------------------------* This message was brought to you via Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) email list server. To subscribe (no fee) to the email list server, send an email to majordomo(--nospam--at)seaoc.org and in the body of the message type subscribe seaoc. You can type anything you like in the subject field. To Unsubscribe send email to majordomo(--nospam--at)seaoc.org and in the body of the message type Unsubscribe seaoc. For questions regarding the list server, send an email to seaoc-ad(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- References:
- Re: "Thickness" of Finite Elements Modeling Floor/Roof Diaphragm
- From: Lynn Howard
- Re: "Thickness" of Finite Elements Modeling Floor/Roof Diaphragm
- Prev by Subject: Re: "Thickness" of Finite Elements Modeling Floor/Roof Diaphragm
- Next by Subject: Re: (no subject)
- Previous by thread: Re: "Thickness" of Finite Elements Modeling Floor/Roof Diaphragm
- Next by thread: RE: Steel Joist
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]