Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
3-10% error in nail tables
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: 3-10% error in nail tables
- From: BVeit(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 14:55:35 -0400 (EDT)
There has been some discussion of conflicting values in the code with respect to nail values, which vary by 3 to 10 percent, and the resulting problems if liability were an issue. Does anyone really believe that our design is so tight that if the nails were only 90% of what we thought they were, the design would fail? A lot of engineers get excited by variability on the analysis/ capacity end, when in fact the gross variability is on the demand side -- estimating the chaotic forces of nature. Brian Veit, P.E.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3-10% error in nail tables
- From: bcain
- Re: 3-10% error in nail tables
- From: Stan Johnson
- Re: 3-10% error in nail tables
- Prev by Subject: Re: AN - Holdown Placement
- Next by Subject: RE: 3-10% error in nail tables
- Previous by thread: RE: Subject:UBC - Discrepancies between various printings
- Next by thread: Re: 3-10% error in nail tables
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]