Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: APA EWS PRI 400 Wood Joists
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: APA EWS PRI 400 Wood Joists
- From: smthengr(--nospam--at)sirius.com (Jeff Smith)
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:01:41 -0800 (PST)
>1. The joists are being promoted, in part, upon their ability to provide >relatively long spans (up to 60 feet). Nevertheless, the joists are >manufactured with absolutely no camber or crown. There is no defined >top and bottom. Won't deflection be a significant problem? Regarding camber, I had a discussion with the local rep a while back. My recollection is that they use to camber wood I joists on a special order. I believe the open web joists can still be cambered (anyone know?). When using long spans for a combination roof and ceiling joist, there can be perceptable deflections. So if you want a dead level ceiling, you may need to isolate the roof and ceiling, or furr it level after the majority of dead load is applied. Floors have a much higher live load deflection/performance criteria so dead load deflections may not be as perceptable. I would think that *extremely* deep joists would be required to control vibration with 60 foot floor spans. Regards, Jeff Smith. S.E. phone: (415) 543-8651 fax: (415) 543-8679 email: smthengr(--nospam--at)sirius.com Smith Engineering 27 South Park San Francisco, CA 94107
- Prev by Subject: APA EWS PRI 400 Wood Joists
- Next by Subject: Re: APA EWS PRI 400 Wood Joists
- Previous by thread: Re: APA EWS PRI 400 Wood Joists
- Next by thread: Re: APA EWS PRI 400 Wood Joists
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]