Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: '97 code seismic map -- Questions, questions, questions
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaoc(--nospam--at)seaoc.org
- Subject: Re: '97 code seismic map -- Questions, questions, questions
- From: BVeit <BVeit(--nospam--at)aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:10:11 EST
Bill Sherman writes: <<I recently compared the 1997 UBC requirements with the 1994 UBC requirements for a project in Seismic Zone 2B, and also found the lateral coefficient to be much higher in 1997.>> Will the year 2000 code follow the '97 seismic provisions, or will they be entirely new (again) as some have suggested? Is the fine tuning of the new code warranted with respect to the variability of naturally occuring phenomena such as earthquakes? Should we even bother to learn the '97 seismic provisions? Brian Veit, P.E.
- Prev by Subject: Re: '97 code seismic map
- Next by Subject: Re: '97 code seismic map -- Questions, questions, questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Entire Engineering Community Freaking Out?
- Next by thread: Re: '97 code seismic map -- Questions, questions, questions
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]