Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: 1997 UBC Simplified Design
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: 1997 UBC Simplified Design
- From: "Yousefi, Ben" <Ben.Yousefi(--nospam--at)ci.sj.ca.us>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:16:43 -0700
The exceptions to the static lateral force procedure that apply to the simplified procedure are listed in section 1630.2.3.4. Section 1630.6 that deals with the horizontal distribution of shear is not one of the exceptions. Therefore, if you have a bona-fide rigid diaphragm, even if you use the simplified procedure, you still need to distribute your horizontal shear according to the rigidity of the vertical lateral force resisting elements. Ben yousefi, SE San Jose, CA -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Tucker & Associates, Inc [SMTP:jtaeng(--nospam--at)pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 9:47 AM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: 1997 UBC Simplified Design I recently attended the SEAOC Seismic Design Manual (Vol. 1) seminar that was held on June 12. During the presentation of determining the simplified design base shear per example 20 in the Seismic Design Manual, I believe that the speaker mentioned that a rigidity analysis would not be required as the loading is conservative using this method. Is this correct?
- Follow-Ups:
- Concrete Foundation Design Reference
- From: Ed Fasula
- Concrete Foundation Design Reference
- Prev by Subject: Re: 1997 UBC Simplified Design
- Next by Subject: FW: 1997 UBC Simplified Design
- Previous by thread: Re: 1997 UBC Simplified Design
- Next by thread: Concrete Foundation Design Reference
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]