Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- From: "Bill Allen" <Bill(--nospam--at)AllenDesigns.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 07:40:15 -0700
There is "practicing" and then there is "practicing". For example, I have a tremendous amount of respect for the contributions Dick Phillips has made to the seismic code over a long, long period of time. However, Dick is the author of the infamous "10/lw" component for calculating the redundancy factor for shear walls. Dick works for a large engineering firm and I doubt if he has designed many wood framed residential structures lately. Only recently has he been made aware of the implication in the language of the code where short shear walls are penalized by this language where he intended only to "help" long shear walls. Dick will be the first person to say that the language did not come out just right. Unfortunately, he may not have realized at the time, he had to get it right the first time because the next opportunity he had to correct the language would be in the 2001 IBC Addenda. As I have stated before, I know there is no benefit for criticizing the code authors for the problems in the 1997 UBC. If all we do is criticize them, they will stop volunteering to do this thankless job then where would we be? The unfortunate part is that we have lost the dynamics of the interaction of administration, research and practice in a time where the rest of the world is becoming more dynamic. The crime here is that there are few (if any) opportunities to edit and embellish code language for whatever reason including the application of common sense. I sit here at my desk and can only dream how nice it would be if someone like SEAOC (who else?) could/would publish something like the "Masonry Chronicles" that would assist design engineers, plan check engineers alike (IMO, the 1997 UBC is a wonderful tool for the expert witness) to design and build safe and logical structures as well as to help foster an environment where we can still afford to practice this profession (i.e., KISS). Regards, Bill Allen, S.E. ALLEN DESIGNS Laguna Niguel, CA <snip> || Chris Poland || || ps: Check the roster of the code writers. You will find a || lot of practicing || structural engineeers who care enough to volunteer.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- From: Bart Needham
- Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- References:
- Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- From: Chris D. Poland
- Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- Prev by Subject: Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- Next by Subject: Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- Previous by thread: Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- Next by thread: Re: '97 UBC Design - Are you too old to change your ways???
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]