Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: '97 UBC Lateral Design - Envelope Solutions???? Calmed down reply

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: Re: '97 UBC Lateral Design - Envelope Solutions???? Calmed down reply
From: "Ed Workman" <eworkman(--nospam--at)fix.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 09:59:19 -0700

-----Original Message-----
From: Swingle, Mark <Mark.Swingle(--nospam--at)dgs.ca.gov>
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org' <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Cc: 'mswingle(--nospam--at)earthlink.net' <mswingle(--nospam--at)earthlink.net>
Date: Friday, September 24, 1999 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: '97 UBC Lateral Design - Envelope Solutions???? Calmed down
reply

 The most important piece in this puzzle is the
>stiffness of the WALLS, .....  I still don't
>know how one can determine the forces to the walls assuming .... rigid
>diaphragm when the shear wall deflection equations are so poorly defined,
>limited in scope, subject to interpretation, and non-linear.

This is the crux and should have been asked, and answered,  within and
without the committees long before this

Prev by Subject: RE: '97 UBC Lateral Design - Envelope Solutions???? Calmed down r eply
Next by Subject: 1/3 Increase for Wind
Previous by thread: seaint-return(--nospam--at)se (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: '97 UBC Lateral Design - Envelope Solutions???? Calmed down

About this archive
Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]