Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
- From: "Polhemus, Bill" <wlpolhemus(--nospam--at)sbinfra.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 15:07:50 -0600
That's not the point. Since Dionysius Exiguus established the fore-runner to our modern calendar in 525 A.D., we have all agreed to abide by it. That's almost 1,500 years of agreement, mind you! The thing that is really galling is that the public doesn't know anything anymore, and the mainstream media pander to their ignorance. There was no "year 0" in "Dennis the Short's" calendar. We began counting at 1 A.D. Years 1-1000 were the first millenium A.D.; Years 1001-2000 are the second millenium. The Third Millenium starts in 2001! -----Original Message----- From: Jason Emoto [mailto:jasone(--nospam--at)kpff.com] Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 3:04 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: Re: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax") I read in the newspaper a few weeks ago that most theological historians believe that the fellow who came up with the current calendar (sometime around 700 A.D.) got the date of Jesus' birth wrong by a few years. So the new millennium probably began about 3 or 4 years ago anyway.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
- From: Darien Tebbe
- RE: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
- Prev by Subject: RE: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
- Next by Subject: Re: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
- Previous by thread: RE: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
- Next by thread: RE: (And A Rant About "The New Millenium Hoax")
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]