Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- From: "Omar M. Waqfi" <OMW(--nospam--at)eqe.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 18:03:39 -0700
The requirement of 3x applies to new construction. However, you can utilize an existing 2x for wall anchorage. The loads should be concentric on the (E) framing and adequate nailing to the plywood panel is necessary to develop the O/P wall loads into the subdiaphragm sheathing. The purpose of using 3x is to achieve proper nailing pattern at the plywood panels edges without splitting the framing member and maintaining enough effective area of the framing member after loss of section due to drilling. An alternative to drilling the (E) 2x is to use self drilling screws.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- From: Sam Chang
- Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- Prev by Subject: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- Next by Subject: Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- Previous by thread: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- Next by thread: Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]