Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- From: Sam Chang <szchang(--nospam--at)mail.arc.nasa.gov>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 18:36:55 -0700
I got:
748 pounds for 1/2" dia. anchor in an existing 2x RWD sill,
1077 pounds for drilling in a new 5/8" dia. anchor in an existing 2x RWD sill &
1488 pounds for 5/8" dia. anchor in a new 3x pressure treaded DF #1.
I would like to find out what values are you using?
Sam Chang, SE
At 06:03 PM 4/7/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>The requirement of 3x applies to new construction. However, you can utilize an
>existing 2x for wall anchorage. The loads should be concentric on the (E)
>framing and adequate nailing to the plywood panel is necessary to develop the
>O/P wall loads into the subdiaphragm sheathing. The purpose of using 3x is to
>achieve proper nailing pattern at the plywood panels edges without splitting
>the
>framing member and maintaining enough effective area of the framing member
>after
>loss of section due to drilling. An alternative to drilling the (E) 2x is to
>use
>self drilling screws.
>
- References:
- Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- From: Omar M. Waqfi
- Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- Prev by Subject: Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- Next by Subject: Fw: **Norton AntiVirus** SupportNow! Virus Warning!
- Previous by thread: Re: (2)2x vs. 3x in wall anchorage
- Next by thread: Re: Seismic loads, Mexican Code vs. UBS]
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]