Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
[no subject]
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- From: dennis pantazis <dpantazis(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:11:12 -0800 (PST)
i am working on a 3 story wood building, hip roof, h~ 45' . boca exposure b, v=80 mph. roof truss spans ~60 feet with a 6 foot overhang (~72' oal), 4:12 pitch. floor trusses are only ~30' in span with interior bearing walls. lightweight gypcrete topping on the subfloor (some DL). its a very light structrure overall, wood sheating, gyp board, insulation. because effecive wind trib area on single trusses is less than 700 sq ft, MWFRS loads actually are defined as components and cladding. for walls that are longer than ~15', the area is above the limit and i can use MWFRS loads for uplift. either way, because of the geometries, i am finding that i have potentially SIGNIFICANT wind uplift, its a combination of: overhangs, almost no superimposed DL, long truss spans. ~1000 lbs of NET uplift at the bearing locations (500lbs/foot)! the exterior walls are being used as shearwalls, but between all the window openings and being so lightly loaded that they have chord uplift and moderately sized hold downs already. i am going to specify hurricane clips/straps to transfer the uplift to the walls/headers. thing is now i have uplift in the walls! the most obvious thing to do is cut the spans in half, and have roof trusses that are 2 independant right triangels to form the overall roof section. end result is the same, i have uplift in the walls, only now not as much but in 4 instead of 2. it is easy to visualise a discrete loadpath ie: headers need to strapped to the jacks & kings, etc... to carry the uplifts down to the next level and strapping across the floor system to the levels below. how does one design/detail for this "distrubuted" condition of net uplift along a wall's length? do i need to just consider the whole shearwall/drag strut system resolving the forces => leading to greater overturning => bigger shears per foor and larger hold downs? mohr's circle to yeild greatest diaphram shears or simply create tension continuity between floors only with sheathing? typically we specify that the wall sheathing splices at each level over the rimjoist, and lap over the sill plate. i am trying to rationalize utilizing the sheathing spanning over the wall and acting as a tension tie between floors but i am getting nowhere. i am interested in how others would approach this design & detailing issue. as always, thanks in advance. dennis pantazis, pe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! http://photos.yahoo.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Wind uplift on a 3-Story wood structure from Dennis Pantazis, PE
- From: Structuralist
- RE: Wind uplift on a 3-Story wood structure from Dennis Pantazis, PE
- Next by Subject: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: Re: lag screw standard?
- Next by thread: RE: Wind uplift on a 3-Story wood structure from Dennis Pantazis, PE
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]