Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: "X" Bracing
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: "X" Bracing
- From: sscholl2(--nospam--at)juno.com
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 22:42:39 -0700
X bracing (rods used for tension forces only) is used in every metal building I have ever heard about or seen. I have a relatively large one under construction now as a fire station. All X bracing is tension only. Stan Scholl, P.E. Laguna Beach, CA On Thu, 24 May 2001 12:21:07 -0700 "Larry Hauer" <lrhauer(--nospam--at)earthlink.net> writes: > I have been asked to provide engineering services for the expansion > of an older prefab metal building with existing "X" braced tie rods > for the lateral load carrying system. Somewhere I remember hearing > the this type of lateral resisting system has fallen out of favor, > and that tension only "X" bracing may no longer be allowed, although > I couldn't find any such restriction during a quick look in the 1997 > UBC. Does anyone have any information on "tension only" "X" bracing > in seismic zone 4? > Thanks in advance, > > Larry Hauer, S.E. > * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org
- Prev by Subject: Re: "X" Bracing
- Next by Subject: Re: "X" Bracing
- Previous by thread: Re: "X" Bracing
- Next by thread: Re: "X" Bracing
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]