] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

["Bill Polhemus" <bill(--nospam--at)polhemus.cc>]

FWIW, it is the IRC that has been adopted in Texas, not the IBC. Just got my
copy Saturday, haven't had time to peruse as yet.

I'll get back to you, George.

-----Original Message-----
From: George Richards P.E. [mailto:george(--nospam--at)borm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:51 PM
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
Subject: 2000 IBC v 1999 UBC code question


Second question, {mostly for those of you in Texas where I know that every
home is Engineered :)} where the IBC has been adopted are you still using
Simpson numbers or since they have also included a 1/3 increase on steel are
you down grading them?


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********