Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- From: "Dan Goodrich" <dang(--nospam--at)karren.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:37:57 -0700
Out of curiosity, is there very many people out there designing wood with LRFD? I don't think Simpson has LRFD stuff in it yet. Dan Goodrich, P.E. ----- Original Message ----- From: <Tom.Hunt(--nospam--at)d-fd.com> To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:33 PM Subject: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question > Jeff, > > I can't resist. Your loop hole is simple; use LRFD. > > Thomas Hunt, S.E. > Duke/Fluor Daniel > > ----- Forwarded by Tom Hunt/DFD on 10/29/01 02:22 PM ----- > > "Jeff Barrett" > <jbarrett(--nospam--at)peao To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> > fsc.com> cc: > Subject: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question > 10/29/01 02:09 > PM > Please respond > to seaint > > > > > > > Chuck...we are reading it as yes we do have to change our ways, and the 1/3 > increase is no longer an option (with the exception for wood). I wish we > could still take it, but we haven't found anything that will allow it. If > somebody knows of a loop hole, please show me where I can find it in the > IBC. > > Jeff Barrett, P.E. S.E. > > > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** > * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > * > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > * > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > * > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ******** > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- From: Bill Polhemus
- Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- From: J. K.
- RE: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- References:
- Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- From: Tom . Hunt
- Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- Prev by Subject: RE: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- Next by Subject: RE: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- Previous by thread: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- Next by thread: RE: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]