Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- From: chuckuc <chuckuc(--nospam--at)pacbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:04:36 -0800
I'd be very careful about using those values. I believe they are the total of 2 tests. At best they are twice the average failure load using carefully selected pieces of wood. Chuck Utzman "J. K." wrote: > Not yet. But Simpson catalog does list ultimate > capacities. > > --- Dan Goodrich <dang(--nospam--at)karren.com> wrote: > > Out of curiosity, is there very many people out > > there designing > > wood with LRFD? I don't think Simpson has LRFD > > stuff in it > > yet. > > > > Dan Goodrich, P.E. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <Tom.Hunt(--nospam--at)d-fd.com> > > To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:33 PM > > Subject: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question > > > > > > > Jeff, > > > > > > I can't resist. Your loop hole is simple; use > > LRFD. > > > > > > Thomas Hunt, S.E. > > > Duke/Fluor Daniel > > > > > > ----- Forwarded by Tom Hunt/DFD on 10/29/01 02:22 > > PM ----- > > > > > > "Jeff Barrett" > > > <jbarrett(--nospam--at)peao To: > > <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> > > > fsc.com> cc: > > > Subject: > > Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 > > UBC code question > > > 10/29/01 02:09 > > > PM > > > Please respond > > > to seaint > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chuck...we are reading it as yes we do have to > > change our ways, and the > > 1/3 > > > increase is no longer an option (with the > > exception for wood). I wish we > > > could still take it, but we haven't found anything > > that will allow it. If > > > somebody knows of a loop hole, please show me > > where I can find it in the > > > IBC. > > > > > > Jeff Barrett, P.E. S.E. > > > > > > > > > > > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* > > ******* *** > > > * Read list FAQ at: > > http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > > > * > > > * This email was sent to you via Structural > > Engineers > > > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) > > server. To > > > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go > > to: > > > * > > > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > > > * > > > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, > > any email you > > > * send to the list is public domain and may be > > re-posted > > > * without your permission. Make sure you visit > > our web > > > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > > > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** > > ******** > > > > > > > > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* > > ******* *** > > * Read list FAQ at: > > http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > > * > > * This email was sent to you via Structural > > Engineers > > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) > > server. To > > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > > * > > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > > * > > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any > > email you > > * send to the list is public domain and may be > > re-posted > > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our > > web > > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** > > ******** > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > http://personals.yahoo.com > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** > * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > * > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > * > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > * > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ******** ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- References:
- Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- From: J. K.
- Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- Prev by Subject: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- Next by Subject: 2000 IBC v 1999 UBC code question
- Previous by thread: Re: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- Next by thread: RE: 2000 IBC v 1997 UBC code question
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]