Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE:
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE:
- From: "Yousefi, Ben" <Ben.Yousefi(--nospam--at)ci.sj.ca.us>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:25:26 -0800
No, it's the maximum possible moment that can be exerted to the frame by the components of the lateral load path that deliver the force to the frame. For example if the moment due to the strength of the diaphragm delivering the load to the frame, is smaller than the Mu, then that would be the governing design force. This language is scattered throughout the code on several issues such as the beams supporting discontinuous shear walls and the brace connections. It's annoying language, which I personally wish would be stricken out of the code. It causes confusion and ends up wasting a lot of our time in the plan review arguing with designers about what the true strength of elements delivering the forces is. Ben Yousefi, SE San Jose, CA -----Original Message----- From: Joseph R. Grill, PE [SMTP:jgrill(--nospam--at)nelsonengineering.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:48 AM To: SEAINT Subject: I have a question concerning OMF Section 11.2a.1. "FR moment connections that are part of the Seismic Force Resisting System shall be designed for a required flexural strength Mu that is at least equal to 1.1RyMp of the beam or girder or the maximum moment that can be delivered by the system, whichever is less." Is the part "...Maximum moment that can be delivered by the system..." the moment delivered to the connection due to applied factored loads from analysis and appropriate load combinations? Thanks, Joseph R. Grill, PE ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Follow-Ups:
- Re:
- From: Paul Feather
- Re:
- Prev by Subject: [no subject]
- Next by Subject: Re:
- Previous by thread: RE: California PE/SE renewal fees
- Next by thread: Re:
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]