Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: CCD Method Of Anchorage Design
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: CCD Method Of Anchorage Design
- From: "Sherman, William" <ShermanWC(--nospam--at)cdm.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 09:20:37 -0400
The meanings of low, intermediate, and high seismic risk in ACI 318-02 are defined in Table R1.1.8.3. William C. Sherman, PE CDM, Denver, CO Phone: 303-298-1311 Fax: 303-293-8236 email: shermanwc(--nospam--at)cdm.com Rick.Drake wrote: > 1st Question: Should regions of moderate or high seismic risk be > considered equivalent to Seismic Design Categories C, D, E, and F, as > defined by the 2000 IBC and later codes? ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Prev by Subject: Re: CCD Method Of Anchorage Design
- Next by Subject: RE: CCD Method Of Anchorage Design
- Previous by thread: Re: CCD Method Of Anchorage Design
- Next by thread: Lateral Seismic Loads on Piles
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]